In total there are 780 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 779 guests
Most users ever online was 1091 on Wed Aug 16, 2023 5:27 pm
Registered users: Majestic-12 [Bot] based on users active over the past 60 minutes
Moderator: Integra Moderator
"HelterSkelter";p="16461" wrote:if you clicked on Mambo, you would have clicked on Kis
"Vadar";p="16470" wrote:Personally I don't care if it is Integramod2, KisMod, or WhateverMod, so long as it comes SoonMod! <img>
"Solomon";p="16473" wrote:Why not just start a simple feedback poll <img>
"computerz";p="16532" wrote:basically it'll grow on me.. [url=http]irregardless[/url] I'm going to use it...
"The American Heritage Dictionary" wrote:irregardless
SYLLABICATION: irÂÂÂ ·reÂÂÂ ·gardÂÂÂ ·less
PRONUNCIATION: r-gÃÂÂ ¤rdls
ADVERB: Nonstandard Regardless.
ETYMOLOGY: Probably blend of irrespective and regardless.
USAGE NOTE: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative irà¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“ prefix and à¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.
Registered users: Majestic-12 [Bot]